台湾评论员说高市早苗什么桑

你就看他好在那个开会现场啊，很多日本媒体说他是妈妈伞做 appe 的代表，好像没有一个没被他模糊啊？这个这个听起来是不太好，哈哈哈。

他心里在想说，我都维持模糊了啊，你高师找苗算哪棵葱啊？现在日本很多资深的政治人物好都出来批评这个高师找苗啊，他们很知道这个事情的严重性，对任何国家讲这句话根本就是挑战其他国家的主权，如果台湾出现战士的话，他会出兵啊。嗯，你觉得被这个问问题的最多是谁？美国总统啊？嗯， 你觉得川普有讲过吗？他心里在想说，我都维持模糊了啊，你高次扫描算哪颗葱啊？嗯，你还开始公开挑战， 你知道你这个日美关，日美同盟每日安保条约，美国要出兵的，现在拿我美国做后盾，你去挑战中国大陆啊，那你被打的时候我我我不理你了啊，你自己不要去惹是生非，你不要以为你有我美国人的军事保护，你就可以为所欲为， 超市扫描就是犯了这个忌啊。嗯，川普就不吭气了，而且川普讲的话不就已经纸上卖花吗？有些门盟友比哈比哈朋友还不如。

我想大家都看在眼里，就是郑立文的态度跟格局，跟赖心德的态度跟格局放在什么地方？赖心德看到了这个事情，这个是有可能引起胎儿附近动荡不安的事情，赖心德是箭裂心血，好高兴终于可以抱住日本日本大哥哥的大腿， 拉着日本大哥哥一起卷入台海这边。你做人家奴才做成这样也是真了不起，这是离谱到一个极点。 那可是你看曾立文，曾立文其实他讲的是最关键的东西，你以为日本人也想打仗吗？我跟你讲高四早瞄，他们虽然是英派，日本的那些年轻人虽然看起来一副现在很嗨，可是他们真的想打仗，愿意打仗，敢打仗吗？

你是谁啊？哈哈哈，你是谁？你跟台湾是什么关系？你过去是把台湾当做殖民地，你还认为什么？你过去侵略中国道路，你认为中国人会忘掉这个仇恨吗？你敢在台湾的问题上面你还要再去说一些这些话代表你好像很行， 试试看中日之间建交的时候，那时候公报已经写的很清清楚楚，台湾是属于中国的一部分。嗯，那你今天高速扫描，你凭什么这时候来干涉中国的内政？现在连美军都不敢 说是妄然要挑战中国在第一导电之内的军事实力。那你日本如果说是要挑战的话，我说我觉得你自己是皮痒早早打了。嗯，当时长得一样，跟日本政客一样，不见棺材不掉泪。哎。啊，所以一定要让他 看到棺材是他才会退缩。

政治人物啊，特别是在阅党啊，应该要尊重啊，日本国内本身的政治啊，也应该要注意到区域的啊，发展不一样。负面解读 日本的政治工作，民警党这些政客为什么那么媚日，难道今天日本手相如果有做的不对我们都不能批评吗？他毁害的倒是我们的安全。而且说实话话 高斯扫描确实违背了日本一贯的政策，所以我觉得这个这个其实是很危险的讯号，将来如果日本跟大陆的这个争议跟那个冲突升高，台湾绝对会会受到波及。

你就看他好在那个开会现场啊， 很多日本媒体说他是妈妈嗓，这个是很很很严重的，不太好听。你一个一个手像什么？像妈妈嗓一样，这样这样一下跑到这个旁边啊，一下跑去那个人旁边啊，然后蹲下来跟他讲话，我想看到 x 一个留言。什么留言？说 app 的代表好像没有一个没被他模糊 哎，这个这个听起来是不太好哇，他他可能还没有适应，说一个日本的手相该怎么做了。

只要你敢碰台湾，中国一定跟日本算总账！你在反法西斯抗战胜利的八十周年，在对你日本发出强烈的历史警告的时候，你反其道而行之，重新的对台湾 提出了一个超越主权的干预。那既然是这样，大家呢，就干脆打开天窗说说亮话。大家呢，都不用呢装客气装礼貌了，你就试试看还会不会有第二第二次的呢？甲午战争还会不会呢？有马关条条约。只要你敢碰台湾，中国一定跟日本算总账。

高氏扫描的涉台言论及其错误极为危险，粗暴干涉中国内政，严重违背一个中国原则和中日四个政治文件精神。这是对国际正义的挑战、对战后国际秩序的破坏、 对国际关系基本准则的践踏，公然违背了日本所做的走和平道路的基本承诺，这样的国家根本没有资格要求成为安理会常任。

请问台湾跟你有什么关系啊？嗯，而且你是战败国哎，台湾跟你都没有关系哎，你怎么可以把台湾扯进来？而且一个国家如果要用生存危机来联动说，所以我可以出兵。那不就军国主义吗？

他根本不知道国际政治的复查，他以为他那个妈妈上公关，他就会解决一切的问题。他以为在川普的旁边像一只花蝴蝶一样露出灿烂的笑容，像小女孩一样蹦蹦跳，他就会收服川普。错了， 你变成这正常的老狐狸，他来招马把伞，公关是没有用的。他因为没做过防卫大臣，他根本不知道日本的自卫队现在距离大陆的人民解放军实力差多远， 所以他就妄图要用日本自卫队集体防卫，集体防卫权，然后去介入台海的关系。

hello， everyone and welcome to take note i'm huang， ziyuan today let's talk about the japanese prime minister sunataka， itchy now i've seen many reports about takaichi， some celebrate her as depends first female prime minister a trailblazer others frame her as arby's successor something she herself often plays up and of course there's the ultra conservative angle the far right idealock label warning she might brought back progress and destabilize east asia i get that they are important parts of her political brand and yes she does fit those descriptions but here's what i caution against predicting or analyzing her policies and actions solely through those lenses strip all that way what do you get a politician who once worked for someone with opposing views then turned to tv to build fame and name recognition entered electoral politics and spent over thirty years in the national diet， that's the japanese parliament someone who climbed to the top despite a shaky candidacy and now leads a minority government so beyond all the fanfare and headlines what we really see is a seasoned political operator with a weak domestic power base her top priority and it will remain so is consolidating her own power until she gets it looking strong will matter more than being strong what do i mean by that take last week's remarks one question about china's taiwan region she said if worships that chinese mainlands worships are used and other armed actions are involved i believe this could constitute a survival threatening situation she used that to argue japan's self defense force could then exercise limited collective self defense it made global headlines media outlets were quick to amplify the quote stirring up hype and speculation， but let me ask you this does that mean anything do you think in that scenario that she'd actually send japanese troops into direct military conflict with the chinese military let's not forget this is china in twenty twenty five not china in 1931 a seasoned politician like takaiji won t take that risk when she made those earlier remarks she was speaking to her parliament her domestic audience prices in japan are soaring society is on edge and her own coalition and her own party are divided on how to proceed as weak as her standing already is in the diet she can afford to show more cracks for her opponents to exploit so projecting strength is the only strength she has， but oh boy she picked the wrong bear the pocket chinese foreign ministry spokesperson linjian said in a press conference that her remarks were gravely inconsistent with the political commitments made by the japanese government and in nature and impact in plain terms that was being too faced and toxic this is a red line issue not something she can simply toy with and expect leniency she is punching way above her weight but this is what politicians like her do when they are weak or losing control whether that's causing up to donald trump getting intimate with other leaders as summits or playing up her admiration for margaritature and heavy metal all of that serves one purpose to look powerful and in control， but here's the thing true strength never needs to prove itself so am i worried she will suddenly shake up his station now， it's not about capability japan did it 80 years ago， but not now not with someone who's more about performance than power we can't let someone rock this boat just for their own interest and we won't let politicians use taiwan to make themselves look tough no provocation tolerate。

你看我证明了你就是日本人呐。说你那金的亲自一定要说中战，不要说抗战。高氏枣苗是美国养的 大狗啊，你这条小狗竟然还跟上我跟你讲，你这是找死啊。