维克多弗兰肯斯坦最后被原谅了吗

直到这一天，检察官突然再一次的上门，这庞大的仪器根本没法快速转移，在慌乱中竟将发现了一亿巨大的冰块，里面 冰冻着一个人形物体。从二组口中得知这竟然是他意外死亡的室友尸体后，坚强一时呆力当场，无法接受这样的事实。而门外的检察官也撞门而入，用枪指着二组维基罐头，两人扭打在了一起，二组更是把检察官的手塞入了运转的机器齿轮中，最后趁机逃离了此地。 逃跑过程中坚强决定退出，不想再继续这邪恶的科学实验，可进来容易，退出就很难了，王富贵在乎的只有二足的研究成果，一看坚强退出已是无用 工具，为了避免泄露此次的信息，当下捆绑了坚强扔下了湖底。不过主角就是主角啊，能这么被人杀死也不会叫尼古拉斯坚强啊！被救起的坚强担心 二柱也遭遇同样的威胁，不顾秀英的劝阻执意前往，秀英无奈只能陪着坚强一同前去，可终究是晚了，时间已经来到最后的阶段，也从二柱口中得知为何他如此的痴 命，起死回生之术。原来二祖年幼时，哥哥为了救他丧命，他不在乎汪富贵得到成果后会不会杀他灭口，他只想让事业成功，成功制造生命，甚至直接复活哥哥。一道天雷通过各种传导仪器 流露的实验体中由于能量过大，还是出现了不可避免的意外，这时实验体也缓缓的走向二柱，二柱满怀激动的看着实验体，可等靠近时才发现实验体毫无生气可言，更像一 具无意识的行尸，而实验体也突然发黄起来攻击众人。最后的片段就是坚强二人是如何被九牛二虎之力消灭的。实验体每次科学的开始都是为了美好 的生活以及目标，但随着人心思欲的产生，如果没有最后底线的坚持，最后的结果都只会是一地鸡毛，违背了科学的初衷。本片改变的弗兰克斯坦也起到了一定的警示作用， 告诫人类无限追求科学知识，滥用科学知识只会导致悲剧。今天的影片就解说到这里，我们下篇再见。

frankenstein tells the story of an obsessive scientist victor frankenstein who creates a man and brings him to life the creature teaches himself to read and learns what it is to be human but he's shunned by a hostile society and denied companionship when i looked around i saw and heard of none like me was i then a monster， a blot upon the earth from which all men fled and whom all men disowned abandoned and alienated the creature is driven to kill all the people his creator loves the story has become shorthand for the dangers of science run a mock， but the book has also been viewed as political novel， a feminist novel a novel about a godless world is it possible that all of these themes are present in the debut novel of an 18 year old writing at the beginning of the 19th century my first clue in deciphering frankenstein is to understand the ideas that mary shelley's parents wrote about and tried to live by mary came from an incredibly intellectual family her father was william godwin， the radical philosopher writer and anarchist godman argued that society and ownership were corrupting forces and that mankind would be more virtuous if we returned to a state of nature ideas that echo through frankenstein her mother was the radical feminist mary wilston craft wilston craft had led an extraordinary life before she met gordon she already had a child from an affair she'd had in revolutionary paris and she'd written a bold palemic arguing the case for a quality for women so this is mary wolston crafts book a vindication of the rights of women and it's just extraordinary she says women are not allowed to have sufficient strength of mine to acquire what really deserves the name of virtue it's great i love it， but it's no wonder that horace warpole called her a hyena in petticoats both of her parents use their writing as a straightforward means to forceful beliefs， i want to find out how much that's true of frankenstein as well， i'm going to cambridge to meet professor nora kirk， who's an expert in the writing of the romantic period and in the work of mary shelley in particular， i want to understand what other ideas of woven into frankenstein alongside the gripping horror story welcome hello nova， i think if she was intending the book to be morally difficult。 你好你好。 you know there will be people who will be sympathetic to frankenstein there would be others who would be sympathetic to the monster you know and i think she is trying to make people feel uncomfortable about what should we do do you know watch and human beings do to explore these ideas the reader has to navigate their way through a labyrinthine structure the novel opens with a series of letters from an arctic explorer， robert walton to his sister recainting how he has come across a half dead victor frankenstein on the ice frankenstein's story is enclosed within walton's letters and within frankenstein's story is the creature's narrative reported in his own voice cursed creator why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust god and pity made man beautiful and alluring off to his own image but my form is filthy type of yours the creature becomes monstrous only after he's abandoned and mistreated by the people around him a fate that reflects the ideas of mary's father， william godwin about human nature and society i read it as a political novel and i also read it as a novel about philosophical problems particularly um free will versus necessity you know do we have free will i think is a very prominent question that that gets asked through throughout the novel and in the end， we don't know at least she doesn't come out with the conclusive answer， but i think it is to make you think um about how far we have choices could frankenstein have acted any differently， um could the creature of acted any differently you know that you can you can say that it's very much a novel of ideas i think rather than character hmm they're not intended to be domestic and exactly like people you know yeah， yeah they said that they were almost vehicles for particular emotions or particular feelings or other kind of abstract or unconscious fears it's interesting that he chooses that his creature should be a man frankenstein has not chosen to make primal pair and adam and an eve he only makes an adam so again some readings of frankenstein says that that's his hidden desire he only wants an all male world he would like to eliminate women mothers people who give birth and then die and leave you， but frankenstein is certainly skewed towards the idea of birth and death and life and so on being confused。