日本首相高市早苗涉台言论，新加坡怎么说

我来之前刚看到一则消息，新加坡的总理发了一个话，意思是我们中国不应该这么一步不让，步步紧逼， 应该放下身段，应该呢，缓和一下。用了他自己的观点来觉得是中国过于较真了，中国应该对日本呢，放下身段，软一点，说点软话，跟他好好谈。 看到没有，这就是东南亚最敏感的一个，也是最亲美的一个国家的总理，突然说出这么样的言论，说明什么呀？ 也是一个不是很友好的信信号，他看到了美国坚定支持日本，现在他又有点开始要转向，虽然他现在没有转向美国保持中立，但他的言辞里面已经出现了中日现在这个情况，日本不对在前，你中国也不应该这样强 逼。这就说明什么呀？世界在看待中日这个关系问题上，在这一次高氏早媒的错误言论引发的中美新的国家间关系的博弈上来看， 风向标正在开始转移，转到哪美国的态度？美国在公开已经特朗普喊话支持日本了，所以其他的他的友好的国家也好，或者是被他掌控的国家也好，地区也好，都开始在转变态度了， 这仅仅只是一个开始，可能下一步中国和日本的这个高斯招标言论问题所引发的世界关系的紧张会带来更大的震荡。这个波及可能不仅仅是中日，不仅仅是中国东部海域导弹连接线的 这些国家，现在已经看美国的进入，已经把欧洲，把东南亚，还有把其他地区的一些国家的注意力引到了这个上面来，而且呢，这个倾向都是逐渐逐渐转向跟着美国走的节奏，我们现在需要高度警惕， 我们不怕，第一有理在先，第二我们现在是有理有利的在做我们该做的事情，我们不能因为哦有好像国际生有很多反对我们了，我们就放弃原则，放弃我们国家的底线来改善这个关系，绝无可能，你要硬刚可以，来，谁我们都不怕。 我想给我的网友说的是，我们现在看到这个世界国际战略博弈的一个开始，要出现的新的风向标，一个转向，美国正在 聚集他的朋友要进行对中国的全力围殴，下步我们面临的形势将会更加严峻，我们要做好充分的准备。

你就告给你自己吧，台湾有几个说你自己带赢了的，都都是他说你的活该多给你结果搞的害怕这个的，对吗？是吧， 可乐活动的一天特别多特别好听。 新疆 我一看到就知道一个 see if you got to wait in a job for taking hand down fruit 黑了。

mark twins observation history doesn't repeat itself， but it often rhymes has never felt heavier today， the radway emanating from tokyo and a prime minister sanai takaichi carries a dangerous and a familiar alcohol of the darkest stances in the region's past earlier this month takaish declared during questioning in the japanese lower house budget committee that a contingency in taiwan could represent a survival threatening situation for japan directly implying armed intervention in the taiwan street， the last time， japan used the pretext offer survival crisis to justify preemptive military action it plunged east asia into the worst longest antifacious war in china's case is from 1931 to 1945， the human cost was staggering china alone suffered thirty five millimelitarian civilian casualties the depravity reached his peak in horrors like the nanjing massacre where over three hundred thousand chinese civilis and arm soldiers were slaughtered in just six weeks this all began with the same cynical argument before the 1931 september 18's incident architects of aggression a thirded that only the immediate arguation of chinese territory could secure japan's national survival years later before the attack on pearl harbor， the warmongers again insisted that a survival threatening situation forced them to strike first fast forward to the day takaichi has become the first sitting japanese leader to declare that a contingency in taiwan could constitute the same survival threatening situation she is doing this to complete a long term conservative project curing down the illegal fair walls of the post war order that order was built on the post and declaration and cemented by the article 9 of japan his pacifist constitution which explicitly forbids japan from maintaining a war potential， but decades of lego erosion have paved the way for takaichi's move the first bridge happened in 1954， which established the south defense forces and there's a loophole of inherent south defense the geographic bridge in 1999 defined that operational areas not geographically， but situationally allowing the sdf to roam the whole asia pacific the final bridge happened in 2014 to 2015 and able to change the constitution former prime minister chenzo， abe simply reinterpreted his cabinet resolution granted japan the right to collective self defense to fight alongside allies even with not being attacked this was a constitutional crew the hall of going to work for japan was now legal now takai， she is providing the wing and where by explicitly linking taiwan to a survival crisis she is taking a based legal weapon and aiming it at his first target she's moving japan from a legally war capable state to an openly combat ready one this is confirmed by japan's new security strategy which also rises massive offensive missiles and explicitly aims to resolve situations in a manner favorable to japan the mask of self defense is off this move provokes three devastating consequences for japan and the region first takaish's explicit strat of force values the un charter， which commands all states to refrain from the strat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity second it completely betrays the four sino japanese political documents including the 1972 john statement， where japan respected the stance that taiwan is an inalignable part of china third as worn by the chinese poe daily intervention risks turning the entire country into a battlefield by sacrificing is postwork commitment to peaceful development japan guarantees the deterioration of its its own security environment the critical question for the international community is this when a state uses sophisticated legal mechanisms not to uphold its constitution， but to systematically dismantle the poor international commitments that ended a world war what president that they said for global order history may rhyme， but the legal foundation of the post war order is immutable and the china takai intends to challenge today is not the china of yesteryear。