日本人知道高市别搞事吗

高氏枣苗辞职向中国人民道歉。当地时间二十一日晚，超过一千七百名日本民众在东京首相官邸旁举行抗议活动。在现场看到，日本民众用标语口号对高氏枣苗近期错误言行表达强烈不满。 台湾本来没事，全是高石在搞事，理性的国民不需要战争。抗议者一针见血。所谓存亡危机根本是借口，实则是要把日本拖回战争老路。和平秩序不是某位政客的修辞素材，而是地区稳定的现实基础。 任何试图撕开这层基础的言论都会迎来反对。高氏嘴上说着遵守终日联合声明行动，却疯狂践踏和平献章，我外交部早已亮明态度，别玩说一套做一套的把戏，玩火者必自焚。

你就告给你自己吧，台湾有几个说你自己带赢了的，都都是他说你的活该多给你结果搞的害怕这个的，对吗？是吧， 可乐活动的一天特别多特别好听。 新疆 我一看到就知道一个 see if you got to wait in a job for taking hand down fruit 黑了。

虚告是小心玩火的后果，没人能为你守时静静悄算不清，就像往外面摔烂碳，裹在 对的像座山。别把和平 大事不可逆转。

mark twins observation history doesn't repeat itself， but it often rhymes has never felt heavier today， the radway emanating from tokyo and a prime minister sanai takaichi carries a dangerous and a familiar alcohol of the darkest stances in the region's past earlier this month takaish declared during questioning in the japanese lower house budget committee that a contingency in taiwan could represent a survival threatening situation for japan directly implying armed intervention in the taiwan street， the last time， japan used the pretext offer survival crisis to justify preemptive military action it plunged east asia into the worst longest antifacious war in china's case is from 1931 to 1945， the human cost was staggering china alone suffered thirty five millimelitarian civilian casualties the depravity reached his peak in horrors like the nanjing massacre where over three hundred thousand chinese civilis and arm soldiers were slaughtered in just six weeks this all began with the same cynical argument before the 1931 september 18's incident architects of aggression a thirded that only the immediate arguation of chinese territory could secure japan's national survival years later before the attack on pearl harbor， the warmongers again insisted that a survival threatening situation forced them to strike first fast forward to the day takaichi has become the first sitting japanese leader to declare that a contingency in taiwan could constitute the same survival threatening situation she is doing this to complete a long term conservative project curing down the illegal fair walls of the post war order that order was built on the post and declaration and cemented by the article 9 of japan his pacifist constitution which explicitly forbids japan from maintaining a war potential， but decades of lego erosion have paved the way for takaichi's move the first bridge happened in 1954， which established the south defense forces and there's a loophole of inherent south defense the geographic bridge in 1999 defined that operational areas not geographically， but situationally allowing the sdf to roam the whole asia pacific the final bridge happened in 2014 to 2015 and able to change the constitution former prime minister chenzo， abe simply reinterpreted his cabinet resolution granted japan the right to collective self defense to fight alongside allies even with not being attacked this was a constitutional crew the hall of going to work for japan was now legal now takai， she is providing the wing and where by explicitly linking taiwan to a survival crisis she is taking a based legal weapon and aiming it at his first target she's moving japan from a legally war capable state to an openly combat ready one this is confirmed by japan's new security strategy which also rises massive offensive missiles and explicitly aims to resolve situations in a manner favorable to japan the mask of self defense is off this move provokes three devastating consequences for japan and the region first takaish's explicit strat of force values the un charter， which commands all states to refrain from the strat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity second it completely betrays the four sino japanese political documents including the 1972 john statement， where japan respected the stance that taiwan is an inalignable part of china third as worn by the chinese poe daily intervention risks turning the entire country into a battlefield by sacrificing is postwork commitment to peaceful development japan guarantees the deterioration of its its own security environment the critical question for the international community is this when a state uses sophisticated legal mechanisms not to uphold its constitution， but to systematically dismantle the poor international commitments that ended a world war what president that they said for global order history may rhyme， but the legal foundation of the post war order is immutable and the china takai intends to challenge today is not the china of yesteryear。