高市早苗属于侵略行为吗

mark twins observation history doesn't repeat itself， but it often rhymes has never felt heavier today， the radway emanating from tokyo and a prime minister sanai takaichi carries a dangerous and a familiar alcohol of the darkest stances in the region's past earlier this month takaish declared during questioning in the japanese lower house budget committee that a contingency in taiwan could represent a survival threatening situation for japan directly implying armed intervention in the taiwan street， the last time， japan used the pretext offer survival crisis to justify preemptive military action it plunged east asia into the worst longest antifacious war in china's case is from 1931 to 1945， the human cost was staggering china alone suffered thirty five millimelitarian civilian casualties the depravity reached his peak in horrors like the nanjing massacre where over three hundred thousand chinese civilis and arm soldiers were slaughtered in just six weeks this all began with the same cynical argument before the 1931 september 18's incident architects of aggression a thirded that only the immediate arguation of chinese territory could secure japan's national survival years later before the attack on pearl harbor， the warmongers again insisted that a survival threatening situation forced them to strike first fast forward to the day takaichi has become the first sitting japanese leader to declare that a contingency in taiwan could constitute the same survival threatening situation she is doing this to complete a long term conservative project curing down the illegal fair walls of the post war order that order was built on the post and declaration and cemented by the article 9 of japan his pacifist constitution which explicitly forbids japan from maintaining a war potential， but decades of lego erosion have paved the way for takaichi's move the first bridge happened in 1954， which established the south defense forces and there's a loophole of inherent south defense the geographic bridge in 1999 defined that operational areas not geographically， but situationally allowing the sdf to roam the whole asia pacific the final bridge happened in 2014 to 2015 and able to change the constitution former prime minister chenzo， abe simply reinterpreted his cabinet resolution granted japan the right to collective self defense to fight alongside allies even with not being attacked this was a constitutional crew the hall of going to work for japan was now legal now takai， she is providing the wing and where by explicitly linking taiwan to a survival crisis she is taking a based legal weapon and aiming it at his first target she's moving japan from a legally war capable state to an openly combat ready one this is confirmed by japan's new security strategy which also rises massive offensive missiles and explicitly aims to resolve situations in a manner favorable to japan the mask of self defense is off this move provokes three devastating consequences for japan and the region first takaish's explicit strat of force values the un charter， which commands all states to refrain from the strat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity second it completely betrays the four sino japanese political documents including the 1972 john statement， where japan respected the stance that taiwan is an inalignable part of china third as worn by the chinese poe daily intervention risks turning the entire country into a battlefield by sacrificing is postwork commitment to peaceful development japan guarantees the deterioration of its its own security environment the critical question for the international community is this when a state uses sophisticated legal mechanisms not to uphold its constitution， but to systematically dismantle the poor international commitments that ended a world war what president that they said for global order history may rhyme， but the legal foundation of the post war order is immutable and the china takai intends to challenge today is not the china of yesteryear。

我的 我的天呐， 哈喽， in a quote coy who needs but most i get there about this。 我头晕了。

mark twins observation history doesn't repeat itself， but it often rhymes has never felt heavier today， the radway emanating from tokyo and a prime minister sanai takaichi carries a dangerous and a familiar alcohol of the darkest stances in the region's past earlier this month takaish declared during questioning in the japanese lower house budget committee that a contingency in taiwan could represent a survival threatening situation for japan directly implying armed intervention in the taiwan straight， the last time japan used the pretext of a survival crisis to justify preemptive military action it plunged east asia into the worst longest anti fascists war in china's case is from 1931 to 1945， human cost was staggering china alone suffered a thirty five million military and civilian casualties the depravity reached its peak in horus like the nanjing massacre where over three hundred thousand chinese civilis and an arm soldiers were slaughtered in just six weeks this all began with the same cynical argument before the 1931 september 18th incident architects of aggression authority that only the immediate occupation of chinese territory could secure japan's national survival years later before the attack on pearl harbor， the warm hungers are gain insisted that a survival threatening situation forced them to strike first fast forward to the day takaichi has become the first sitting japanese leader to declare that a contingency in taiwan could constitute the same survival threatening situation she's doing this to complete a long term conservative project curing down the illegal fair walls of the post war order that order was built on the post and declaration and cemented by the article 9 of japan his pacifist constitution which explicitly forbids japan from maintaining a war potential， but decades of legal erosion have paved the way for takaichi's move the first bridge happened in 1954， which established the south defense forces and there's a loophole of inherent south defense the geographic bridge in 1999 defined that operational areas not geographically， but situationally allowing the stif to roam the whole asia pacific the final bridge which happened in twenty fourteen to twenty fifteen and able to change the constitution former prime minister chenzo， abe simply reinterpreted his cabinet resolution granted japan the right to collective self defense to fight alongside allies even would not be attacked this was a constitutional crew the hall of going to war for japan was now legal now takai， she is providing the wing and where by explicitly linking taiwan to a survival crisis she is taking up his legal weapon and aiming it at his first target she's moving japan from a legally war capable state to an openly combat ready one this is confirmed by japan's new security strategy which also rises massive offensive missiles and explicitly aims to resolve of situations in a manner favorable to japan the mask of self defense is off this move provokes three devastating consequences for japan and the region first takaiji's explicit threat of force values the un charter， which commands all states to refrain from the strat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity second it completely betrays the four sino japanese political documents including the 1972 john statement where japan respected the stands that taiwan is an inalienable part of china third as worn by the chinese pla daily intervention risks turning the entire country into a battlefield， but sacrificing is postwork commitment to peaceful development japan guarantees the deterioration of of its own security environment the critical question for the international community is this when a state uses sophisticated legal mechanisms not to uphold its constitution， but to systematically dismantle the poor international commitments that ended a world war what president does this set for global order history may rhyme， but the legal foundation of the post war order is immutable and the china takaiji intends to challenge today is not the china of yesteryear。

如日方胆敢武力介入台海局势，将构成侵略行为，中方必将迎头痛击。日本军国主义历史上曾多次以所谓存亡危机为借口发动对外侵略， 包括以行使自卫权为由，悍然制造九一八事变。今天，日本首相高智扫描再提所谓存亡危机事态究竟是何居心？ 是否要重蹈军国主义负责？是否要再次同中国人民和亚洲人民为敌？ 是否企图颠覆战后国际秩序？我们将坚决行使联合国宪章和国际法赋予的自卫权，坚定捍卫国家主权和领土完整。我们正告日方必须身 刻反省历史罪责，立即停止干涉中国内政、挑衅越陷的错误言行，不要在台湾问题上玩火，玩火者必自焚。

高氏是对侵略历史认识极端错误的代表性的这个六一议员，比如说他曾经在这个电视节目中说侵华战争是日本为了保证自己安全性进行的，这个战争是一种这个自卫战争，这个显然荒谬的啊。行动上他迄今为止几乎每年都去参拜这个晋国神圣，他任手相本身就是又一抬头的一种表现而已。