如果高市早苗撤回不当言论会怎么样

我是 高氏扫描在发表涉台错误言论之后，曾向身边人士坦言说的过头了，一边让官员议员抛出所谓澄清，一边又拒绝触及错误言论的根本问题，高氏扫描仍幻想这场危机能在不付出代价的情况下软着陆， 高市政府想要通过模糊的表态来蒙混过关，这只会暴露出日方错误的认知和政策取向，让日方的处境更加被动。

mark twins observation history doesn't repeat itself， but it often rhymes has never felt heavier today， the radway emanating from tokyo and a prime minister sanai takaichi carries a dangerous and a familiar alcohol of the darkest stances in the region's past earlier this month takaish declared during questioning in the japanese lower house budget committee that a contingency in taiwan could represent a survival threatening situation for japan directly implying armed intervention in the taiwan street， the last time， japan used the pretext offer survival crisis to justify preemptive military action it plunged east asia into the worst longest antifacious war in china's case is from 1931 to 1945， the human cost was staggering china alone suffered thirty five millimelitarian civilian casualties the depravity reached his peak in horrors like the nanjing massacre where over three hundred thousand chinese civilis and arm soldiers were slaughtered in just six weeks this all began with the same cynical argument before the 1931 september 18's incident architects of aggression a thirded that only the immediate arguation of chinese territory could secure japan's national survival years later before the attack on pearl harbor， the warmongers again insisted that a survival threatening situation forced them to strike first fast forward to the day takaichi has become the first sitting japanese leader to declare that a contingency in taiwan could constitute the same survival threatening situation she is doing this to complete a long term conservative project curing down the illegal fair walls of the post war order that order was built on the post and declaration and cemented by the article 9 of japan his pacifist constitution which explicitly forbids japan from maintaining a war potential， but decades of lego erosion have paved the way for takaichi's move the first bridge happened in 1954， which established the south defense forces and there's a loophole of inherent south defense the geographic bridge in 1999 defined that operational areas not geographically， but situationally allowing the sdf to roam the whole asia pacific the final bridge happened in 2014 to 2015 and able to change the constitution former prime minister chenzo， abe simply reinterpreted his cabinet resolution granted japan the right to collective self defense to fight alongside allies even with not being attacked this was a constitutional crew the hall of going to work for japan was now legal now takai， she is providing the wing and where by explicitly linking taiwan to a survival crisis she is taking a based legal weapon and aiming it at his first target she's moving japan from a legally war capable state to an openly combat ready one this is confirmed by japan's new security strategy which also rises massive offensive missiles and explicitly aims to resolve situations in a manner favorable to japan the mask of self defense is off this move provokes three devastating consequences for japan and the region first takaish's explicit strat of force values the un charter， which commands all states to refrain from the strat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity second it completely betrays the four sino japanese political documents including the 1972 john statement， where japan respected the stance that taiwan is an inalignable part of china third as worn by the chinese poe daily intervention risks turning the entire country into a battlefield by sacrificing is postwork commitment to peaceful development japan guarantees the deterioration of its its own security environment the critical question for the international community is this when a state uses sophisticated legal mechanisms not to uphold its constitution， but to systematically dismantle the poor international commitments that ended a world war what president that they said for global order history may rhyme， but the legal foundation of the post war order is immutable and the china takai intends to challenge today is not the china of yesteryear。

你看，我就知道一个。

mark twins observation history doesn't repeat itself， but it often rhymes has never felt heavier today， the radway emanating from tokyo and a prime minister sanai takaichi carries a dangerous and a familiar alcohol of the darkest stances in the region's past earlier this month takaish declared during questioning in the japanese lower house budget committee that a contingency in taiwan could represent a survival threatening situation for japan directly implying armed intervention in the taiwan straight， the last time japan used the pretext of a survival crisis to justify preemptive military action it plunged east asia into the worst longest anti fascists war in china's case is from 1931 to 1945， human cost was staggering china alone suffered a thirty five million military and civilian casualties the depravity reached its peak in horus like the nanjing massacre where over three hundred thousand chinese civilis and an arm soldiers were slaughtered in just six weeks this all began with the same cynical argument before the 1931 september 18th incident architects of aggression authority that only the immediate occupation of chinese territory could secure japan's national survival years later before the attack on pearl harbor， the warm hungers are gain insisted that a survival threatening situation forced them to strike first fast forward to the day takaichi has become the first sitting japanese leader to declare that a contingency in taiwan could constitute the same survival threatening situation she's doing this to complete a long term conservative project curing down the illegal fair walls of the post war order that order was built on the post and declaration and cemented by the article 9 of japan his pacifist constitution which explicitly forbids japan from maintaining a war potential， but decades of legal erosion have paved the way for takaichi's move the first bridge happened in 1954， which established the south defense forces and there's a loophole of inherent south defense the geographic bridge in 1999 defined that operational areas not geographically， but situationally allowing the stif to roam the whole asia pacific the final bridge which happened in twenty fourteen to twenty fifteen and able to change the constitution former prime minister chenzo， abe simply reinterpreted his cabinet resolution granted japan the right to collective self defense to fight alongside allies even would not be attacked this was a constitutional crew the hall of going to war for japan was now legal now takai， she is providing the wing and where by explicitly linking taiwan to a survival crisis she is taking up his legal weapon and aiming it at his first target she's moving japan from a legally war capable state to an openly combat ready one this is confirmed by japan's new security strategy which also rises massive offensive missiles and explicitly aims to resolve of situations in a manner favorable to japan the mask of self defense is off this move provokes three devastating consequences for japan and the region first takaiji's explicit threat of force values the un charter， which commands all states to refrain from the strat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity second it completely betrays the four sino japanese political documents including the 1972 john statement where japan respected the stands that taiwan is an inalienable part of china third as worn by the chinese pla daily intervention risks turning the entire country into a battlefield， but sacrificing is postwork commitment to peaceful development japan guarantees the deterioration of of its own security environment the critical question for the international community is this when a state uses sophisticated legal mechanisms not to uphold its constitution， but to systematically dismantle the poor international commitments that ended a world war what president does this set for global order history may rhyme， but the legal foundation of the post war order is immutable and the china takaiji intends to challenge today is not the china of yesteryear。

主播说联播，今天我来说。日本首相高氏扫描近日公然发表涉台挑衅言论，而且拒不撤回。有关言论不仅严重违背中日四个政治文件精神，从根本上损害中日关系政治基础， 严重恶化中日人员交流氛围，给在日中国公民人身和生命安全带来重大风险。 外交部、文旅部已经发文提醒中国游客近期避免前往日本旅游。教育部也建议中国公民谨慎规划赴日留学安排，中方的相关举措及时合理很有必要。 日本领导人的错误言论不仅招致中方强烈反对，也已经在日本国内形成反事。日本多名政界人士批评高氏扫描的言论愚蠢、危险。日本一些主流媒体 接连发表涉论，批评高氏扫描鲁莽亲率，多个民间团体还自发集会，高呼高氏扫描下台。日本经济也受到明显的冲击。今天的东京股市、旅游股大跌。 一些国际人士认为，高氏扫描的错误言论亵渎历史正义，其真正意图是要为日本未来军事扩张铺路，这些政治操作必将遭到地区国家的反对。 无论日本哪个党派、哪个人执政，都必须坚持和恪守日本政府在台湾问题上的承诺。 中日四个政治文件对台湾问题做出的明确规定，就是日本政府做出的郑重承诺具有国际法效力，没有任何模糊曲解的空间。日方必须收回相关错误言行，停止越 玩火。如果高氏扫描死不悔改，甚至胆敢挺而走险，必将遭受到迎头痛击，把日本推向万劫不复的境地。

那么对于高师长们来讲，他能不能把这个话收回去？我觉得他现在调子起的太高已经很难了。为什么啊？ 假如他要收回去，他要退一步了，就他原来是打造的强硬人设，人设，嗯，基本上就坍塌了。不仅如此，而且我认为很有可能这个对于他的政治生涯来讲就是一只滑铁壶，他可能就干不下去，可能就要下台了，嗯。

你就告给你自己吧，台湾有几个说你自己带赢了的，都都是他说你的活该多给你结果搞的害怕这个的，对吗？是吧， 可乐活动的一天特别多特别好听。 新疆 我一看到就知道一个 see if you got to wait in a job for taking hand down fruit 黑了。

日本首相高氏扫描的涉台错误言论，从根本上损害了中日关系的政治基础，激起了中国人民的公愤和谴责。 如果日方拒不撤回，甚至一错再错，中方将不得不采取严厉坚决的反制措施，由此产生的一切后果由日方承担。

日本首相高氏扫描的错误言论引发国际人士及日本人士强烈批评。他们表示，高氏错误言论严重违背国际法和国际关系基本准则，将严重损害地区稳定。 俄罗斯外交部发言人扎哈罗瓦今日表示，日本首相高氏扫描的涉台言论非常危险，日本军火主义发动的侵略战争给亚洲和世界带来深重灾难，也让日本付出惨痛代价。 高氏扫描等日本政界人士应深刻反省历史，警惕错误言行可能引发的严重后果。 前，世界最需要的是朝着和平共处的方向迈进。在中国倡导的多边主义理念下，各国相互理解、交流合作，共同构建人类命运共同体，这一点十分重要。我相信日本民众也同样期望如此。 the japanese 日本手相的表态具有恶意， 这反映出日本军国主义正在抬头。我们必须记住，日本在二战期间是军国主义国家，中国和其他亚洲国家都记得那段历史。 高氏扫描显然在试图煽动国内民族主义情绪，我们所有人都应对此保持警惕。十九号，韩国民间团体在日本驻韩国大使馆外举行集会，谴责高氏扫描近期的错误言论对整个东亚地区的和平造成威胁， 送礼了一大堆日本民众。十九号、二十号连续两天在东京和京都等地举行抗议活动，要求高氏扫描立即撤回错误言论。完了后你我先给你你 所谓台湾有事的相关错误言论必须马上被撤回。高氏那样不负责任、煽动战争的轻率言论让人非常担忧。 我们真的想与中国友好相处，日本应该进一步好好反省战争。我们希望学校能对下一代进行适当的教育。 战争历史，日本对中国及亚洲做了什么，好好交清楚，然后朝着未来前进。多位日本人士指出，高氏的错误言论破坏日中关系政治基础，违反国际法精神。一九七二年 日中邦交正常化石发表的中日联合声明明确指出，日本政府承认中华人民共和国政府是中国的唯一合法政府，明确指出，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分。 高氏相关言论破坏日中关系政治基础，这是极其危险的，我们强烈要求他必须收回这一发言。 高氏的言论破坏了日中之间和平友好、平等互利的原则，几乎全面否定了中日四个政治文件精神，既违反联合国宪章，也违反日本宪法。