mark twins observation history doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes has never felt heavier today, the radway emanating from tokyo and a prime minister sanai takaichi carries a dangerous and a familiar alcohol of the darkest stances in the region's past earlier this month takaish declared during questioning in the japanese lower house budget committee that a contingency in taiwan could represent a survival threatening situation for japan directly implying armed intervention in the taiwan straight, the last time japan used the pretext of a survival crisis to justify preemptive military action it plunged east asia into the worst longest anti fascists war in china's case is from 1931 to 1945, human cost was staggering china alone suffered a thirty five million military and civilian casualties the depravity reached its peak in horus like the nanjing massacre where over three hundred thousand chinese civilis and an arm soldiers were slaughtered in just six weeks this all began with the same cynical argument before the 1931 september 18th incident architects of aggression authority that only the immediate occupation of chinese territory could secure japan's national survival years later before the attack on pearl harbor, the warm hungers are gain insisted that a survival threatening situation forced them to strike first fast forward to the day takaichi has become the first sitting japanese leader to declare that a contingency in taiwan could constitute the same survival threatening situation she's doing this to complete a long term conservative project curing down the illegal fair walls of the post war order that order was built on the post and declaration and cemented by the article 9 of japan his pacifist constitution which explicitly forbids japan from maintaining a war potential, but decades of legal erosion have paved the way for takaichi's move the first bridge happened in 1954, which established the south defense forces and there's a loophole of inherent south defense the geographic bridge in 1999 defined that operational areas not geographically, but situationally allowing the stif to roam the whole asia pacific the final bridge which happened in twenty fourteen to twenty fifteen and able to change the constitution former prime minister chenzo, abe simply reinterpreted his cabinet resolution granted japan the right to collective self defense to fight alongside allies even would not be attacked this was a constitutional crew the hall of going to war for japan was now legal now takai, she is providing the wing and where by explicitly linking taiwan to a survival crisis she is taking up his legal weapon and aiming it at his first target she's moving japan from a legally war capable state to an openly combat ready one this is confirmed by japan's new security strategy which also rises massive offensive missiles and explicitly aims to resolve of situations in a manner favorable to japan the mask of self defense is off this move provokes three devastating consequences for japan and the region first takaiji's explicit threat of force values the un charter, which commands all states to refrain from the strat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity second it completely betrays the four sino japanese political documents including the 1972 john statement where japan respected the stands that taiwan is an inalienable part of china third as worn by the chinese pla daily intervention risks turning the entire country into a battlefield, but sacrificing is postwork commitment to peaceful development japan guarantees the deterioration of of its own security environment the critical question for the international community is this when a state uses sophisticated legal mechanisms not to uphold its constitution, but to systematically dismantle the poor international commitments that ended a world war what president does this set for global order history may rhyme, but the legal foundation of the post war order is immutable and the china takaiji intends to challenge today is not the china of yesteryear。
粉丝656.0万获赞2.4亿

mark twins observation history doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes has never felt heavier today, the radway emanating from tokyo and a prime minister sanai takaichi carries a dangerous and a familiar alcohol of the darkest stances in the region's past earlier this month takaish declared during questioning in the japanese lower house budget committee that a contingency in taiwan could represent a survival threatening situation for japan directly implying armed intervention in the taiwan street, the last time, japan used the pretext offer survival crisis to justify preemptive military action it plunged east asia into the worst longest antifacious war in china's case is from 1931 to 1945, the human cost was staggering china alone suffered thirty five millimelitarian civilian casualties the depravity reached his peak in horrors like the nanjing massacre where over three hundred thousand chinese civilis and arm soldiers were slaughtered in just six weeks this all began with the same cynical argument before the 1931 september 18's incident architects of aggression a thirded that only the immediate arguation of chinese territory could secure japan's national survival years later before the attack on pearl harbor, the warmongers again insisted that a survival threatening situation forced them to strike first fast forward to the day takaichi has become the first sitting japanese leader to declare that a contingency in taiwan could constitute the same survival threatening situation she is doing this to complete a long term conservative project curing down the illegal fair walls of the post war order that order was built on the post and declaration and cemented by the article 9 of japan his pacifist constitution which explicitly forbids japan from maintaining a war potential, but decades of lego erosion have paved the way for takaichi's move the first bridge happened in 1954, which established the south defense forces and there's a loophole of inherent south defense the geographic bridge in 1999 defined that operational areas not geographically, but situationally allowing the sdf to roam the whole asia pacific the final bridge happened in 2014 to 2015 and able to change the constitution former prime minister chenzo, abe simply reinterpreted his cabinet resolution granted japan the right to collective self defense to fight alongside allies even with not being attacked this was a constitutional crew the hall of going to work for japan was now legal now takai, she is providing the wing and where by explicitly linking taiwan to a survival crisis she is taking a based legal weapon and aiming it at his first target she's moving japan from a legally war capable state to an openly combat ready one this is confirmed by japan's new security strategy which also rises massive offensive missiles and explicitly aims to resolve situations in a manner favorable to japan the mask of self defense is off this move provokes three devastating consequences for japan and the region first takaish's explicit strat of force values the un charter, which commands all states to refrain from the strat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity second it completely betrays the four sino japanese political documents including the 1972 john statement, where japan respected the stance that taiwan is an inalignable part of china third as worn by the chinese poe daily intervention risks turning the entire country into a battlefield by sacrificing is postwork commitment to peaceful development japan guarantees the deterioration of its its own security environment the critical question for the international community is this when a state uses sophisticated legal mechanisms not to uphold its constitution, but to systematically dismantle the poor international commitments that ended a world war what president that they said for global order history may rhyme, but the legal foundation of the post war order is immutable and the china takai intends to challenge today is not the china of yesteryear。



据日本媒体二十三号报道,针对日本首相高氏扫描的涉台错误言论,日本前首相识破茂当天再次进行批评。他表示在牵涉到外交的问题上不能过一时嘴瘾,希望高氏内阁注意,不能在发言时只想着自己的支持率。 此前,石破茂十三号曾在一档广播节目中对高氏的错误言论表示反对。据共同社二十三号报道,日本最大在野党历县民主党党首野田家宴当天呼吁高氏扫描努力修复与中国的关系。 据日媒此前报道,叶田曾于十六号在长期县举行的党内会议上批评高氏涉台表态言论越界,导致日中关系陷入非常严峻的局面,相当轻率。此外,多国人士认为, 高氏的一系列错误言行挑衅国际正义,破坏战后国际秩序,践踏国际关系基本准则,后果严重,危害深重。 now the glitch on the govery honesty, you experience more monogues showing a strong of a stupid system safely and you've just necessaricia nebrastada itsever's motion initiative buddhish it's compliant illinois budam najid stoneya doom with us as natural catastrophovian and planning virtual noodles then you can increase asia recently japan was designated as a friend of natto, an expansion of not going to the southern eastern asia risk not only confrontation with china, but with a napa of other players in that part that is strategment of takaiji even risky, the policy of one china, and i think that is detrimental, not only to that region, but also to the world。 英国亚太问题研究学者珍妮克莱格指出,开罗宣言等文件是构建战后和平秩序的重要基础。 连大第二七五八号决议明确,中华人民共和国政府是代表全中国的唯一合法政府,谁无视这些历史,就意味着要损害国际社会维护世界和平秩序的努力。 克莱格直言,高氏的错误言行并非偶然,与其长期频繁参拜晋国神社以及加速日本军事化进程等动作密切相关, 日本始终未能真正反省其战争中的反人类罪行,至今依然予以否认。美国国际问题专家、前驻白宫记者威廉琼斯认为,高氏错误言行 是军国主义、扩张主义等危险倾向的回潮,危害战后世界繁荣与稳定。此外,塞内加尔官方媒体太阳报刊文称,高是错误言行无视国际法,带有严重挑衅意味,与历史事实和国际共识背道而驰。
