高市早苗像情报局什么

mark twins observation history doesn't repeat itself， but it often rhymes has never felt heavier today， the radway emanating from tokyo and a prime minister sanai takaichi carries a dangerous and a familiar alcohol of the darkest stances in the region's past earlier this month takaish declared during questioning in the japanese lower house budget committee that a contingency in taiwan could represent a survival threatening situation for japan directly implying armed intervention in the taiwan street， the last time， japan used the pretext offer survival crisis to justify preemptive military action it plunged east asia into the worst longest antifacious war in china's case is from 1931 to 1945， the human cost was staggering china alone suffered thirty five millimelitarian civilian casualties the depravity reached his peak in horrors like the nanjing massacre where over three hundred thousand chinese civilis and arm soldiers were slaughtered in just six weeks this all began with the same cynical argument before the 1931 september 18's incident architects of aggression a thirded that only the immediate arguation of chinese territory could secure japan's national survival years later before the attack on pearl harbor， the warmongers again insisted that a survival threatening situation forced them to strike first fast forward to the day takaichi has become the first sitting japanese leader to declare that a contingency in taiwan could constitute the same survival threatening situation she is doing this to complete a long term conservative project curing down the illegal fair walls of the post war order that order was built on the post and declaration and cemented by the article 9 of japan his pacifist constitution which explicitly forbids japan from maintaining a war potential， but decades of lego erosion have paved the way for takaichi's move the first bridge happened in 1954， which established the south defense forces and there's a loophole of inherent south defense the geographic bridge in 1999 defined that operational areas not geographically， but situationally allowing the sdf to roam the whole asia pacific the final bridge happened in 2014 to 2015 and able to change the constitution former prime minister chenzo， abe simply reinterpreted his cabinet resolution granted japan the right to collective self defense to fight alongside allies even with not being attacked this was a constitutional crew the hall of going to work for japan was now legal now takai， she is providing the wing and where by explicitly linking taiwan to a survival crisis she is taking a based legal weapon and aiming it at his first target she's moving japan from a legally war capable state to an openly combat ready one this is confirmed by japan's new security strategy which also rises massive offensive missiles and explicitly aims to resolve situations in a manner favorable to japan the mask of self defense is off this move provokes three devastating consequences for japan and the region first takaish's explicit strat of force values the un charter， which commands all states to refrain from the strat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity second it completely betrays the four sino japanese political documents including the 1972 john statement， where japan respected the stance that taiwan is an inalignable part of china third as worn by the chinese poe daily intervention risks turning the entire country into a battlefield by sacrificing is postwork commitment to peaceful development japan guarantees the deterioration of its its own security environment the critical question for the international community is this when a state uses sophisticated legal mechanisms not to uphold its constitution， but to systematically dismantle the poor international commitments that ended a world war what president that they said for global order history may rhyme， but the legal foundation of the post war order is immutable and the china takai intends to challenge today is not the china of yesteryear。

mark twins observation history doesn't repeat itself， but it often rhymes has never felt heavier today， the radway emanating from tokyo and a prime minister sanai takaichi carries a dangerous and a familiar alcohol of the darkest stances in the region's past earlier this month takaish declared during questioning in the japanese lower house budget committee that a contingency in taiwan could represent a survival threatening situation for japan directly implying armed intervention in the taiwan straight， the last time japan used the pretext of a survival crisis to justify preemptive military action it plunged east asia into the worst longest anti fascists war in china's case is from 1931 to 1945， human cost was staggering china alone suffered a thirty five million military and civilian casualties the depravity reached its peak in horus like the nanjing massacre where over three hundred thousand chinese civilis and an arm soldiers were slaughtered in just six weeks this all began with the same cynical argument before the 1931 september 18th incident architects of aggression authority that only the immediate occupation of chinese territory could secure japan's national survival years later before the attack on pearl harbor， the warm hungers are gain insisted that a survival threatening situation forced them to strike first fast forward to the day takaichi has become the first sitting japanese leader to declare that a contingency in taiwan could constitute the same survival threatening situation she's doing this to complete a long term conservative project curing down the illegal fair walls of the post war order that order was built on the post and declaration and cemented by the article 9 of japan his pacifist constitution which explicitly forbids japan from maintaining a war potential， but decades of legal erosion have paved the way for takaichi's move the first bridge happened in 1954， which established the south defense forces and there's a loophole of inherent south defense the geographic bridge in 1999 defined that operational areas not geographically， but situationally allowing the stif to roam the whole asia pacific the final bridge which happened in twenty fourteen to twenty fifteen and able to change the constitution former prime minister chenzo， abe simply reinterpreted his cabinet resolution granted japan the right to collective self defense to fight alongside allies even would not be attacked this was a constitutional crew the hall of going to war for japan was now legal now takai， she is providing the wing and where by explicitly linking taiwan to a survival crisis she is taking up his legal weapon and aiming it at his first target she's moving japan from a legally war capable state to an openly combat ready one this is confirmed by japan's new security strategy which also rises massive offensive missiles and explicitly aims to resolve of situations in a manner favorable to japan the mask of self defense is off this move provokes three devastating consequences for japan and the region first takaiji's explicit threat of force values the un charter， which commands all states to refrain from the strat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity second it completely betrays the four sino japanese political documents including the 1972 john statement where japan respected the stands that taiwan is an inalienable part of china third as worn by the chinese pla daily intervention risks turning the entire country into a battlefield， but sacrificing is postwork commitment to peaceful development japan guarantees the deterioration of of its own security environment the critical question for the international community is this when a state uses sophisticated legal mechanisms not to uphold its constitution， but to systematically dismantle the poor international commitments that ended a world war what president does this set for global order history may rhyme， but the legal foundation of the post war order is immutable and the china takaiji intends to challenge today is not the china of yesteryear。

我是 高氏扫描在发表涉台错误言论之后，曾向身边人士坦言说的过头了，一边让官员议员抛出所谓澄清，一边又拒绝触及错误言论的根本问题，高氏扫描仍幻想这场危机能在不付出代价的情况下软着陆， 高市政府想要通过模糊的表态来蒙混过关，这只会暴露出日方错误的认知和政策取向，让日方的处境更加被动。

高氏枣苗的面相藏着什么？有没有人跟我一样啊，看到高氏枣苗的第一眼就浑身发毛，真不是我带偏见啊，跟政治国籍没有半毛钱关系，纯粹是这张自带凶器的脸，让人打心眼里不敢打 咱们的老祖宗说相由心生，这可不是封建迷信啊，这是千百年传下来的识人智慧。易经里边早就说过，官相识人，见貌之心，一个人的内心是藏不住的，全写在脸上了。咱们先来看高氏扫描的眼睛，这可是个最吓人的地方， 你们有没有发现他的眼珠啊，总像死鱼似的往外凸着，不是正常的圆润，是那种往外鼓的突兀感。看人的时候啊，根本不是平视，而是像毒蛇盯着猎物，眼神啊，冷冰冰的，还透着一股啊想抢想占有的贪婪劲，再加上 他的眼眶是深陷的，所以呢，就把这双凸眼衬的更凶。那股咄咄逼人的劲，隔着屏幕你都能感觉到冰冷感。 在面相里边叫做风木。左传里边早就下过定论，风木而柴声忍人也。意思就是啊，长着风眼的人，性格暴力，心里边藏着狠劲，做事没底线。你想想，他敢公然扯台湾问题的文化， 不就是这次凶性在作祟吗？这心里啊，压根就没有规矩俩字，只想着怎么博眼球，怎么谋私利，完全不管会不会引发大乱子。 再看他的颧骨，简直是凶相的标配啊，那颧骨高高的耸着，还没有一点肉包裹，就像两座光秃秃的孤风戳在那张枯瘦的脸上。你看易经里就说了啊，颧骨为拳，肉为人。这颧骨高没问题啊，但 是没有肉就说明了缺乏人心。象书里也说啊，这泉高无肉，主泉遇炙热而亲情淡薄。这种孤风泉的人啊，满脑子都是争权夺利，为了往上爬能六亲不认，身边的人在他的眼里啊，全是垫脚石。 咱们看他的形式风格，是不是刚好就对上了？为了选票，为了权利，什么敏感话题都敢碰，什么伤人的话都敢说，根本不顾及中日关系的大局，也不管日本民众的真实利益，眼里啊，就只有自己的政治野心，这就是典型的 压倒一切。最后再看他整张脸的格局，枯瘦如柴，一层蜡黄的薄皮紧紧的裹着骨头，没有一点圆润的浮态。你看易经理就说了啊，面由心生，境随心转。这脸上有肉不是指胖，是指内心平和有包容心带来的温润 气色。而他的脸呢，干巴巴的，硬邦邦的，透着一股刻薄寡恩的冷意。就像冬天里啊，没有叶子的枯树，看着没有一点生机和善意。最后让人后背发凉的是他眼里的神，那不是老年人该有的浑浊，而是一种精于算计的邪光。 每次他说话的时候，你们发现没有，这眼神飘来飘去的，闪烁不定的，那里边全是算计、嫉妒和恶意。 心理学已经印证了，这眼神是藏不住内心的，一个人的心里干净，这眼神自然就清澈，心里边如果全是坏主意，这眼神就会透着阴痕。 你们有没有过这样的感觉，有些人啊，哪怕不说话，你看一眼就知道不好惹，不能交。高氏枣苗一看就是这种人。他的面相啊，不是单一部位的问题，而是蜂木和孤蜂泉枯面 凑在一块，形成一种孤客怪力的整体气场。这种气场啊，是内心状态的外放，是骗不了人的。咱们老祖宗的识人术之所以能够传下来，是因为他背后是人性的规律。易经里就说了， 同声相应，同气相求。一个人心存善念，这面相就会温和。一个人心存恶念，这面相就会狰狞。高氏扫描的凶相啊，本质上就是他内心贪婪、刻薄、好斗的外在表现。所以啊，咱们厌恶他，真不是凭空反感，是本能的察觉到了这种危险的气场。 他敢在台湾问题上胡言乱语，也不是一时冲动，是他的本性使然。只要能达到目的，什么红线都敢踩，什么后果都不怕。但是啊，咱们也别怕，易经里还有天道好还的道理，凶相之人看似嚣张，实则违背天道，最终只会自食恶。 就像这一次啊，他乱说话，日本外物省还得派个人来中国灭火，结果碰了一鼻子灰，这不就是印证吗？记住，面相不是宿命，是星星的镜子，一个人的样子，藏着他的全部过往和未来选择。高氏扫描的面相早就告诉我们啊，他并不是什么善类， 他是一个为了权利不择手段，毫无底线的人。正在看我视频的朋友们，你们是不是也有这样的感觉？