最近呢,因为日本首相高氏早描在那胡言乱语,胡乱搞事,使本来就脆弱又不怎么样的中日关系大踏步的向后退。 台湾没什么事,但是日本倒是真有事了,他肯定要为此付出极大的代价。纵观高氏早描的言论,是典型的不了解历史,不了解中国,也不了解日本的不负责任的口嗨。 不了解历史是战后的法律法规和国际共识,都说明了台湾是中国的内政,轮不到你在那张嘴介入。而不了解中国是不知道这是中国红线里的红线,核心中的核心,中国不可能妥协后退。 不了解日本是他真的不知道现在日本有几斤几两,话很大,能干的事很少很小,过把嘴瘾之后只能打自己的脸,还是好好学习,回到正路上好一点。
粉丝1.8亿获赞118.4亿


如日方胆敢武力介入台海局势,将构成侵略行为,中方必将迎头痛击。日本军国主义历史上曾多次以所谓存亡危机为借口发动对外侵略, 包括以行使自卫权为由,悍然制造九一八事变。今天,日本首相高智扫描再提所谓存亡危机事态究竟是何居心? 是否要重蹈军国主义负责?是否要再次同中国人民和亚洲人民为敌? 是否企图颠覆战后国际秩序?我们将坚决行使联合国宪章和国际法赋予的自卫权,坚定捍卫国家主权和领土完整。我们正告日方必须身 刻反省历史罪责,立即停止干涉中国内政、挑衅越陷的错误言行,不要在台湾问题上玩火,玩火者必自焚。

日本首相高势扫描最近彻底成了港式扫描,他日前在台湾问题上大放厥词,甚至暗示日本可能武力介入台海。这是日本战败以来,日本担任领导人,首次在台湾问题上表达试图武装介入的野心。 为了获得权利,他可以毫不犹豫的放弃盟友原则信誉。他的政治路径既清晰又自我,不靠施政,不靠智力,只靠制造争议、煽动情绪、投机攀附。 如今作为首相,他依旧沿用过去的套路,经济搞不定就炒作台湾问题,政权不稳固就扩大防卫预算,民生难改善就不断制造危机。他把日本政治当做舞台,拿日本的国运开玩笑,只为在权利的悬崖上多站一会。 如日方胆敢武力介入台海局势,将构成侵略行为,中方必将迎 口统计。我们正告日方必须深刻反省历史罪责,立即停止干涉中国内政、挑衅越线的错误引起,不要在台湾问题上玩火,玩火者必自焚。

japan's new prime minister has only been in office for about a month how do you see this spat between china and japan over taiwan? this represents a significant change in japan's stance on taiwan up until now it's been rather ambiguous about what situations would be considered threatening japan's national survival and requiring self defense forces to be activated, but she has gone out and set it directly now takaichi has told the world that japan might be involved in a taiwan conflict and so this is a remark that china can't just ignore it has to escalate in response to japan's escalation and that's what we're seeing now a lot of words back and forth nothing in terms of action right now, but until now this ambiguity allowed for good trade relations to continue despite assumptions that japan really did have this stance on taiwan jeffrey, what makes taiwan such a delicate matter and and what has changed with the new administration in japan miss takaichi, she represents the hawkish wing of the ldp, japan's ruling party and she has long had very hawkish views on china as a threat to japan so this might be a reflection of what she wants to do with the country and certainly her supporters on the right will well welcome japan taking this open stance, but uh it's not clear what kind of damage this will actually do to the practical relations between the countries and there's a lot of historical baggage that goes with this topic of course a lot of animosity between japan and china having thought number wars in the past, uh could this depute possibly more about settling scores from the past partly it could there is the issue also of takaichi's own views on history where she holds revisionist views that the chinese government would consider abhorrent views that justify japan's wartime conduct or downplay the bad things that japan did during the war and so although she hasn't voiced these views since becoming prime minister chinese reactions to her remark about national survival and taiwan have been compared to japan in the 1930s saying that its military intervention an invasion of chinese territory was for the sake of national defense or survival and so this brings to mind this very dark history that has left wounds in china that the chinese government constantly mentions。