粉丝14.7万获赞391.9万

m m r 和 e l 的区别?这两种算法大同小异,因为 m m r 自制磁石就是根据 e l 自制,专为游戏改变的。 m m r 自制磁石也就更符合游戏,也更平衡,比 gl 的姿势用在游戏中更为合理。但是可别小看 gl, 它是由一位美国物理学家所设置出来的,最早被使用在国字象之中,连我们维持的分段用的也是 glo, 凭此自制被广泛使用在各种对议活动中。 早期各类网络禁止游戏使用的也是 glo, 随着版本的迭代, mm r 才慢慢在游戏方面取代了 elo。 下期我将给大家带来两种机制的原理,感兴趣的话点个关注吧!

are some of the best cs go players in the world, but how can we accurately compare them when we play matchmaking most of us calculate our kills to deaths or kd ratio to somewhat understand our performance, but when talking about pro players most of the time we talk about a very different and particular number rating two point o rating two point o is a number calculated by hltv org to evaluate a player's performance on a map we can also take someone's ratings from multiple maps over a period of time like a whole best of three a whole tournament or even a whole year and use the average to judge performance over a longer term, but how does rating two point o work and how is it any different from kd ratio first of all kd ratio can have absurdly high and low values in some games making it basically useless for example in a sixteen one victory over complexity at the pgl major antwerp, zyu had zero deaths making his kd ratio infinite zyu is pretty good, but not quite infinitely good, but what about a closer game let's take a look at the performance of brokey in phase versus, astrolos at iem cologne twenty twenty two on the first map brokey led the scoreboard with twenty eight kills in eighteen deaths giving him a one point five six kd ratio on the second map he had eighteen kills and twelve deaths giving him a similar one point five kd, but ultimately he was not as noticeable or impactful there has to be a better more universal way to evaluate brokey's performances on these two maps in twenty ten when cs one point six was still being played hedge l tv came up with rating one point o to address the problems of just looking at kd seven years later, hltv introduced rating two point o with an improved formula think of it as the hltv secret source, so how does it all work first of all rating two point o is not an absolute measure of a player's skill what it shows is how much better or worse a player is compared to the average of one for example in the phase versus australismatch, we mentioned earlier on map one broke, he had a rating of one point four one meaning he had a great match as he performed much above the average whilst his rating in map two was only one point o nine close to the average despite his kd being similar, we can tell he played much better in map one so how do we come up with this number rating two point o consists of five sub ratings for the most part they are pretty self explanatory first, we have kills survivals and damage you also have impact rating which includes multi kills, opening kills, clutch winds and a few additional factors and kast rating which includes kills assists, traded deaths and surviving all of these ratings impact rating to point o, but they also exist on their own and you can check them out on hltv dot org separately for each player all of the sub rating values are calculated on a per round basis what this means is that if you had thirty actions in twenty rounds that rating will be one point five you might have noticed that multiple factors are accounted for several times in rating two point o all of the components are weighted differently in the calculations so that we have a balance between stats that lead directly to winning rounds like kills and damage and stats that have a less impactful, but still consistent contribution like kast now let's take a look at the pgl major antwerp final and compare kd to rating as we can see in some cases rating two point o is barely different from kd, but in some cases it flips the assessment of someone's performance from negative to positive despite carrigan's worst kd he had a higher rating than robs because he had a higher adr and impact another example is boomage who had a poor game and his kd ratio was much worse than simples, but thanks to his kast being on par his rating was just not point one six below, but the most telling example is rain versus brokey their fragging performance was similar, but if we look at sub ratings we'll see that rain was superior in terms of impact and damage these are the markers of the incredible performance he put in which earned him the major mvp so what rating value is good and what rating value is bad the higher the better is the core principle of rating two point o, but the judgment on every value is contextual the very basic context is sample size a rating of one point two two for a map is decent, but nothing special whereas averaging the same rating for a whole event or even a year is much more impressive the competition in which someone played should be taken into perspective as well in twenty twenty one while participating in the academy league monacy had an incredible rating of one point three six even higher than simples in that year, but in twenty twenty two after joining g two monacy's rating dropped to one point one two it's the strength of the opposition that made the biggest difference there are things that the haychel tv rating doesn't take into account for example three frags in a gun round and three frags in an anti eco round would have the same value to someone's rating rating two point o is not intended to be the ultimate evaluation of a player's performance it's just intended to be comprehensive enough, so that we can get a better idea of how pro players perform map to map we believe it's always best to watch the matches for yourself to get the best assessment of。

you're a higher embossed up reliant shishamisma it simply means not needing help or support from other people you can say so how do you like my new lipstick jesus freaking christ girl let me just fix your makeup for you please i got it i got it i'm very self reliant when it comes to make them so does it look fitting。

give me your give me your give me your attention baby i gotta tell you a little something about yourself you're a wonderful flawless ooh you sexy lady but you walk around here like you wanna be someone else。

今天我们来聊一下亚马逊的 litting 和 feedback。 在聊之前,我们需要分清卖家和产品页面的关系。亚马逊的产品页面也就是 listing, 即使你是 listing 的创建者,那么你也是这个产品的供应商之一, 只要符合要求的卖家,都有资格在这个页面上销售这款产品。多个卖家通过服务质量和价格来竞争 listing 的推荐报价,也就是产品购物车。 ok。 了解之前后,我们先来聊一下瑞典, 也就是产品评分,以五星为评级,展示在产品价格的顶部,是影响产品的点击率和转换率的关键因素, 是买家对产品本身的反馈。只要是在这个 listing 上购买,不管是从哪个卖家的购物车下单, view 和 reading 都会留在这个 listing 上面,也就是你的产品被别人跟卖,出现了不好评 下也会出现在这个 listing 上面,主要影响是 listing 的搜索权重和排名。 ok, 那我们再来说一下 back vibex 是买家对订单和卖家的评价,我们通常也叫店铺评价,也是以五星为评级,不 会出现在 listing 上面。买家可以在 siring for mason 页面看到卖家的 feedback, 只有十亿购买了产品的买家才可以做出评价,主要是针对卖家的服务质量以及配送服务的评价。如果是 fba 订单、物流相关的 feedback 会被亚马逊划线删除,不会记分 评价的是出售产品的卖家,主要影响的是卖家的绩效以及 odr。 ok, 你学会了吗?下期见。