起亚嘉华赛那碰撞测试对比

在使用故障这方面啊，这两辆车可以说相当让人省心了，都没什么可值得记录的部分， 那这两台车因为在测试过程中，前后脚发生了追尾事故， 都走了四 s 店进行维修，那丰田塞纳大概不到两周的时间就康复出院了，贾嘉华呢，则是因为众所周知的原因，导致物流停滞了一个多月啊，所以我们等待的时间比较长。那这两辆车重回测试当中之后呢，贾嘉华的右侧电动门锁机部分呢，发生了轻微的异响， 这走的上路一颠的，这两个都响，然后停车的时候也有，刚才应该能听见去四 s 店图润滑油 后故障消失，并且再也没有出现过，应该就是这个这个这个凹槽，他触碰这个东西往往会响一下，有可能你越使他越不会出现这种状况，明吗？啊？那同期丰田塞纳在更换了前雷达探头之后不久，出现了前雷达故障的提醒， 去四 s 店沟通后，技师把前雷达传感器的插头进行了拆卸清洁，故障解决好了 啊，那其实就是接触的问题呗，就有点脏了。那发动机部分呢，两车都有很好的表现，只有起啊嘉华的颗粒捕捉器啊，在接近十万公里的时候提示堵塞，并且在仪表盘上亮起了专属的故障灯。 那在几天之后，我们准备去四 s 店检测的时候，发现，咦，故障灯消失了，应该是带有颗粒捕捉器的国六车型启动的清洁程序，将颗粒捕捉器高温烧时回 恢复了通畅。那除此之外，这两台车在十万公里的测试过程中没有带给我们任何麻烦，相当省心了， 那收回之前费用的悬念啊，算上购车成本的话，丰田塞纳的整体花费其实并没有太出色的表现， 一种很重要的原因呢，就是售价与强制装饰问题，让购车成本高出起亚价花七万多块钱，那后期的油耗和保养虽然比后者呢便宜不少，但是想在十万公里内抹平这些差距呢，也确实是不可能的。 像嘉华这边啊，虽然日常使用没有什么故障，但是五千公里保养一次的厂家设定呢，让我们这种短时间高里程的测试，几乎每周都要去保养一次啊。以现在城市中的用车环境、机油和配件品质，我觉得将保养里程增加至一万公里其实并不是什么难事。 丰田塞纳和起亚嘉华他们在 mpv 战场上 pk 的第一回合啊，就到此告一段落了。虽然说啊，他们的销量相差非常全输，但你会发现，除了油耗之外，其实没有哪一方对另一方形成碾压性的优势，可以说是你方唱罢我登场，难分伯仲啊。 那么接下来呢，我们就会把这两辆车开进车间进行拆解了，从设计用料以及发动机磨损等等方面呢，再次把他们搬成擂台，看看他们能不能做到表里如一， 脱去外衣的他们究竟谁更能打呢？一键三连，赶紧期待下期节目吧！

接下来我们看看平时不易观察却存在感极强的底盘部分，我们还是按照从前到后的顺序开始对比。 丰田塞纳的行走机构前部为钢制全框式副车架，搭配麦佛逊式悬架设计，那这个组合呢，是非常成熟并且常见的设计。 麦弗逊悬架呢，能够最大化的减少侵占发动机舱的空间，为其搭载的二点五升直列四缸自然吸气发动机和 ecvt 变速箱留足地方。前副车架与车身为刚性连接，没有使用橡胶衬套。减震，好处是提高了车头刚性，保证碰撞强度与驾驶时的车头响应速度。 坏处呢，则是少了一层滤震屏障，会影响舒适性和静谧性。悬架机构除前阳角为铝合金材质外，其他结构件均为钢制，减震器呢，也是常见的黄桶一体式设计。 那值得一提的是呢，丰田塞纳采用的是 r e p s 转向系统，电机可以灵活地布置在转向拉杆的平行位置上，并为后期高阶自动驾驶功能作功率。勇于 那起亚嘉华的前行走机构和丰田塞纳是一样的，同为钢制全框式副车架，搭配麦弗逊式悬架设计，材质方面也均为钢材，无可厚非。 那相比丰田塞纳的硬连接呢？贾嘉华在固定副车架这件事上，显然是更多地倾向于隔音和舒适性的考量， 四个固定点呢，均有厚实的橡胶，趁早加持，尽量过滤底盘的噪音和震动，这在我们上级内容的噪音测试环节啊，也有印证。包括怠速在内的所有测试车速成绩，起亚嘉华均好于丰田塞纳， 当然了，这和防火墙和地板隔音材质也是分不开的，那这部分我们稍后再说。卡嘉华呢，它采用的是 c e p s 转向系统，集成在转向柱 上的电机结构紧凑，重量轻，并且成本较低。但是啊，震动控制、转向力具和后期升级空间呢，是没有。丰田的 r eps 系统好的肯定够用，但是确实稍逊一筹。 后副车架方面呢，丰田塞纳依旧采用的是钢制全框式副车架，与车身连接处有橡胶衬套，用于减震，提升后排舒适度。因为海外版车型啊，是有电动四驱可选的，所以后桥内预留了安装电机的空间。 既然国产版本没有四驱车型，那么为什么不和起亚嘉华一样采用非全框式的碟型副车架来降低些许车重，换取更大的油箱，提升续航呢？ 那我们推测呢，是有以下的两种原因，第一呢，塞纳作为全球车型，在国内如果换装其他造型的货悬架呢，会提升车辆的研发生产成本，参考之前说过的啊，焊接式水箱框架能够减少装配环节，降低成本，那么丰 丰田肯定不会在后桥这将降低的成本再给提升回来。第二呢，全框式副支架能够提升车辆后部的刚性， 作为提升车身强度的重要部件，不能随意更改，且丰田塞纳车身中厚部底盘加强金数量明显少于起亚嘉华，有很大一部分原因呢，就是全框式后副车架起到了相似的作用，更不能随意更换了， 否则整车后部都需要进行重新设计。综合来看呢，保持原有的设计是最明智的选择，那起亚嘉华的后副车架呢，和前部一样，采用的是橡胶衬套和车身进行软连接， 且由于车身结构强度勇于足够啊，不太需要全框式副车架来提升车身刚性，所以采用了成本低、质量轻的非全框式碟型副车架，只要设计强度能够满足行走机构的使用就可以了。而后桥的纵臂、摆臂和拉杆等部件的用料比较节省，比如说单层钢板冲压成型 刀臂，对比丰田塞纳双层钢板焊接的合状刀臂，虽然看起来有些单薄，并且对横向震动意志较弱，影响 n v 车表现，但实际强度呢，也足够满足日常驾驶的使用需求了，这在我们十万公里常测中呢，也是得到了很好的印证。 那底盘其他部件的设计上呢？两台车的摆臂球头均使用的是螺栓连接，在球头损坏后可以进行单独的更换，降低了维修成本，且配套使用不同球头的摆臂呢，可以改变其数据，可适配同平台的其他车型，增加了零件的通用性，降低研发成本。

同样是 mpv， 本田奥德赛、丰田塞纳和起亚嘉华相比，谁的安全性更高？数据来源于美国公安全保险协会最新的测试， 测试采取正面百分之五十偏置碰撞车辆以时速六十四公里撞击障碍物。首先来看奥德赛的表现，碰撞瞬间，巨大的冲击力让整个车身后半部分腾空而起，同时车头损毁严重。将镜头拉近，可以看到碰撞瞬间， a 柱没有发生明显变形， 表明车身整体框架是安全的。车头受到严重损伤，在一定程度上起到了吸能作用。镜头转向后排乘客视角，碰撞瞬间，侧气帘及时弹出，且覆盖范围较大，但头枕却意外和座椅发生分离，这可能会造成乘客颈部受伤。我们再从正侧面的视角看一遍回放，注意看后排头枕此时处于正常位置， 但在气囊弹出后便与座椅发生了分离，这一部分在测试中绝对是最大的扣分箱，最终奥德赛的成绩 vp 较差。第二个出场的是丰田塞纳，同样是时速六十四公里撞击障碍物，碰撞瞬间，巨大的冲击力让整个后轮腾空而起， 车头部分的损毁同样非常严重，将镜头拉近并且对准斜前方四十五度角。碰到瞬间，左前轮和车头承受了大部分撞击力，可以看到 a 柱没有发生明显变形，人们车内空间相对安全。 再来看一下后排乘客的情况，碰撞瞬间，侧气帘及时弹出，虽然侧气囊反应稍慢，但也起到了保护乘客的作用，而且整个后排内饰的状态相对稳定，并没有出现头枕分离的情况。 我们再从正侧面看一下回放碰撞瞬间，在气帘的保护下，乘客头部安全，最终塞纳的成绩为 m 一般。第三个出场的是起亚嘉华，论品牌影响力，起亚显然不 本田和丰田两位对手，那他在安全方面表现如何呢？从车身外部来看，起亚嘉华与塞纳和奥德赛没有太大差别。将镜头拉近，可以看到碰撞瞬间，巨大的冲击力致使挡风玻璃被挤碎，但好在 a 柱没有发生明显变形，表明乘客区域是相对安全的状态。 镜头转向车内后排乘客视角，碰撞瞬间，侧气帘及时弹出，但相比之下，覆盖范围有待提高，而且后排头枕也出现了一定的松动， 好在最终没有与座椅发生分离。从正侧面的角度来看，气帘覆盖范围是三辆车中最小的，不过还算是在安全范围之内。最终起亚嘉华的成绩为 m 一般，奥德赛是三辆车中尺寸最小的，同时也是价格最低的， 由于头枕脱落，最终排名垫底。起亚嘉华表现中规中矩，排在第二位。三辆车中表现最好的无疑是丰田塞纳，当然价格他也是最贵的。

起亚加华张家口首撞商务车，大家看看 事故以后的安全性，第三排座椅没有问题，离撞点非常远，这就是空间大、安全性高的特点。

camera guy james， hello， so you've got kids you drive a honda pilot why not drive him anyway， we had a minivan and then we wanted to be cool， so yeah it's a real like consumer logic there， but your honda pilot does not have this much room oh， no， it does it you and i are about to take a video journey together into the world of minivans and when we're done here you're going to be a minivan guru， that's able to confidently walk into the dealership knowing you've chosen the right machine for you so road test coming up for you， but first let's meet this machine let's stack it up against its competition that's the sienna， the pacifica and the odyssey and let's see how every minivan that you can buy in 2023 stacks up against every other minivan that you can buy in 2023 i want to kick things off with a story about my little sister and herkia carnival hello， i'm sarah， i'm the proud owner of these two irish wolfhounds clyde and clifford in the back and the kia carnival thankfully that is the one vehicle that i could find to actually fit these guys and they have a lot of room in the back they're pretty big， but they're also very lazy so thankfully there's a lot of space for them to go ahead and lay down that way they're not bothering me on long trips sara is the doctor dolittle of our family she is a pet groomer vet tech she teaches pet grooming at her local community college and amongst the countless wagging tales in my sister's perpetual wake are these two which belonged to her enormous irish wolfhounds called clyde and clifford sometimes on walks people will say nice horses they are very good boys with heads the size of thanksgiving turkeys i figure because i am justin's little sister i should probably add something that i like about this vehicle the one feature that i think is really handy is the passenger view so i can take a look at the dogs when we're traveling and make sure everybody's comfortable back there without taking my eyes off the road now when i'm your big brother you call me before you buy a car， but when i got that phone call for my sister i didn't have much to tell her about the kia carnival because i hadn't driven it yet she bought one anyways having been one over primarily by her exact priority purchase factors a big flexible and very well equipped machine that doesn't cost an excessive amount of money other than some initial problems with the power sliding doors and battery faced during its first extremely cold winter， sarah and her family have been enjoying it ever since now i couldn't offer my sister this analysis for her minivan shopping process， but now that i've logged a few thousand kilometers in this tester i can offer it to you and here's what you need to know the 36 thousand 495 dollar starting price for the 2024 kia carnival lx includes parking sensors for movable second row seats， led headlamps and lane follow assist the lx plus makes it 40 thousand adding two rows of heated seating wireless phone charging push buttons start power sliding doors a power tailgate and multi zone climate control the ex trim grade brings the ask to 44 thousand with the kia connect system led tail lamps blind spot collision avoidance assist rear cross traffic collision avoid evidence assist and advanced smart cruise control step up to the ex plus for 47， 295 and it's a 12.3 inch multimedia interface with navigation an additional 12.3 inch digital instrument， cluster screen， bird's eye parking， monitor， dual led headlights and led fog lamps my tester is the carnival's fully loaded option the sx priced at 50 thousand it includes two sunroofs both of which actually open leather seating， bo's audio， a passenger， view camera system and vip lounge second row seats more on those later to me going fully loaded is the way to do it here especially since the extra features in the sx are really easy to appreciate if you do a lot of long distance driving if you're on a more modest budget then consider starting with the ex trim grade because that's where the must have safety features really begin joining the options list the kia carnival comes front wheel drive only and delivers combined fuel consumption of 10.6 liters per hundred kilometers that's an annual fuel bill of three thousand nine hundred seventy five dollars assuming that you drive 25 thousand kilometers a year and pay a dollar 50 for a liter of gas for the sake of this comparison that figure is a dead even tie with both the front drive version of the chrysler， pacifica and the honda odyssey which only comes in front wheel drive so to summarize there is no advantage or disadvantage to be had on fuel economy between this trio of front drive non hybrid minivance so the carnival and odyssey come exclusively in front wheel drive and the pacifica and siena are both available with all wheel drive the toyota siena is the only minivan on the list to run a hybrid 4 cylinder engine instead of a straight up v6 that's why it's much easier on fuel than the rest， but also less powerful so in terms of fuel economy the pacific is available all wheel drive system uses an additional one point four liters of gas for every 100 kilometers driven versus a front drive unit so shoppers considering an all wheel drive equipped pacifica should allow for an increase of about 505 dollars annually or about 44 bucks a month to their fuel budget to run the all wheel drive system the toyota sienna is available in front or all wheel drive as well with front wheel drive fuel economy of six point six liters per hundred kilometers means the sienna hyper drinks four liters or about six bucks less gas for every hundred kilometers you drive versus the carnival odyssey or front drive pacifica so based on that same math the front wheel drive sienna hybrids annual fuel bill of 200475 means it uses about fifteen hundred dollars per year or a hundred 25 dollars per month less fuel than any of the other front drive minivans don't be afraid to spend some of those fuel savings on an all wheel drive equipped sienna either in a year of driving the pacifica's all wheel drive system uses 525 dollars more gas than a front wheel drive where the sienna's hybrid all wheel drive system uses just 37 dollars more fuel than a front wheel drive model in that same year of driving so in the pacifica， that's a hundred percent more driven wheels for 13 percent more of your gas dollars and in the sienna hybrid it's a hundred percent more driven wheels for just one point five percent more of your gas dollars instead。