日本涉台发言美有什么反应

japan's new prime minister has only been in office for about a month how do you see this spat between china and japan over taiwan？ this represents a significant change in japan's stance on taiwan up until now it's been rather ambiguous about what situations would be considered threatening japan's national survival and requiring self defense forces to be activated， but she has gone out and set it directly now takaichi has told the world that japan might be involved in a taiwan conflict and so this is a remark that china can't just ignore it has to escalate in response to japan's escalation and that's what we're seeing now a lot of words back and forth nothing in terms of action right now， but until now this ambiguity allowed for good trade relations to continue despite assumptions that japan really did have this stance on taiwan jeffrey， what makes taiwan such a delicate matter and and what has changed with the new administration in japan miss takaichi， she represents the hawkish wing of the ldp， japan's ruling party and she has long had very hawkish views on china as a threat to japan so this might be a reflection of what she wants to do with the country and certainly her supporters on the right will well welcome japan taking this open stance， but uh it's not clear what kind of damage this will actually do to the practical relations between the countries and there's a lot of historical baggage that goes with this topic of course a lot of animosity between japan and china having thought number wars in the past， uh could this depute possibly more about settling scores from the past partly it could there is the issue also of takaichi's own views on history where she holds revisionist views that the chinese government would consider abhorrent views that justify japan's wartime conduct or downplay the bad things that japan did during the war and so although she hasn't voiced these views since becoming prime minister chinese reactions to her remark about national survival and taiwan have been compared to japan in the 1930s saying that its military intervention an invasion of chinese territory was for the sake of national defense or survival and so this brings to mind this very dark history that has left wounds in china that the chinese government constantly mentions。

the prime minister is in a more vulnerable place in japan and japan's public opinion today is not where it was in 2010， i think that these people feel quite worried us has been very quiet and i think right now our president is focused on other things and i'm not sure what kind of role he would want to play anyway compared to previous administrations。

美国还有好几万人驻扎在日本。是，如果说中日有事，嗯，你美国又想做任何动作？是 你在日本的美国驻军就是爱炸空中的导弹就让你受不了，中国大陆对付你日本也是不会用登陆部队。对，但是导弹跟飞机对就够你受的。

你有的时候。

chinese reactions to her remark about national survival and taiwan have been compared to japan in the 1930s saying that its military intervention and invasion of chinese territory was for the sake of national defense or survival。 在十一月十二日播出的节目中，美国学者杰夫瑞霍尔指出，台湾问题对中方至关重要，因此当台湾是中国的一部分，这一核心主张受到挑战时，中方绝不会退让。霍尔解释道， 二十世纪三十年代，日本正是以所谓存亡危机事态为借口，对中国汉人发起侵略恶行。如今本身持有历史修正主义立场的高氏重提这句话， 中国人民自然会联想到侵华历史所来的沉重创伤。早在高氏早描上任之初，霍尔就曾表示，日本首位女手相的强硬风格可能在短期内能够巩固保守派支持，但担忧其极端保守立场将加剧与中韩的紧张关系。

any time you have any question， any doubt anything you want any favors you need anything i can do to help japan we will be there we are an ally at the strongest level a lot of our allies are our friends even our allies took advantage of us on trade more than china did。 现在高氏早描高调的说，之所以没有谈台湾问题，是为高氏早描四千 既告了这个川普，所以川普呢，就决定不谈台湾问题的。嗯，所以你看知道日本的那种，那种狂妄之奶已经到了一个什么样的程度，而高市长呢？将自己膨胀成为哇，他们是决定世界一切的核心。 so indicted to take on that as we were in the currency that and the silence。 六我过目八十年后的今天，谁在企图 挑战中国核心利益，妄想阻挠中国统一大业？中国政府，中国人民，中国军队绝不答应，绝不容忍。

扫描这句话的严重性啊。呃，我觉得日高次扫描自己低估了日本社会，也低估了有些很多媒体说高次扫描是在挑衅， 其实要严格说起来，高斯小苗是在宣战，国与国之间你要说有一个状况好就对，你动物的话，你日本作为一个好吧，独立主权国，你公然说要对另外一个国家开战。嗯， 这个是二十世纪哈，二次大战结束以后大国之间几乎仅见没有见过，可见高氏扫描这个人有多嚣张。嗯，他或者说他有多无知。而且你看高氏扫描这次讲的话，以后美国也不听他。对，美国从头没听他，包括国务院都没听他。