美国参众两院通过台湾决议影响

我们坚决反对美国国会推动社台的消极议案， 坚决反对美国与中国台湾地区开展任何形式的官方往来和军事联系， 敦促美方恪守一个中国原则和中美三个联合公报的规定， 停止武装台湾，停止审议有关议案，停止干涉中国内政。 民间党当局妄图遗物谋毒、备战谋毒，恬不知耻乞求外部势力的虚假保护， 只会让台湾更加兵雄占威，葬送台湾民众的安全扶持。

the years are four hundred twenty seven the nays are one the bill is past。

最近根据高氏扫描的恶言恶行，而解放军不同战区包括不同强力部门都发出的声音像等待东风、量大管饱，都说明呢，通过阅兵展示出的强大战略能力，足以对日本的挑衅行动构成直接回击。所以通过强大的陆海空天作战能力， 要显示中国履行联合国宪政的能力和资格，警告日本政府。而如果涉台问题动用武力，这等于对中国的二次入侵， 是符合联合国宪章敌国条款的情形之一。这个状态下，有可能日本全境都会陷入战争状态。 对于美国搞联合，在台海地区阻挠中国和平统一大业，甚至不惜以武力介入，将会对未来形态产生大的影响，一旦出现任何行动，日本将承担所有责任。

高市长呢？这个画是踩在中国人的历史伤口上，这个是日本右派跟中国人对于国家领土跟民族尊严的价值一个高度的冲突 焦点你把一个中国人认为自己的民族尊严的基本价值在地上踩，嗯， 因为十四亿的中国人，不管你是什么族啊，我相信有超高的标的一个比例啊，都认同台湾是中国主权的不可分割的一部分。嗯。

two thirds being in the affirmative the rules are suspended the bill is past senate has now passed the epstein bill as soon as it comes over from the house。

donald trump has tried to cover up for jeffrey epstein long enough it's time that the senate finished the job to finally compell the department of justice to release the epstein files in a few moments， i will ask unanimous consent for the senate to pass the epstein bill as soon as it comes over from the house jeffrey epstein's victims have waited long enough let the truth come out， let transparency reign。

作为一个台湾出生的人，当然是希望这个问题能够越早解决越好，这个也代表了刚才说的那个中国的实力的增长跟美国实力的衰退。我台湾很多亲戚了，六千年前还在讲，哎呀，美国，美国实力太强了，中国 怎么样也扛不住的啊，美国会保护我们的。两三年前就开始讲，不再讲那个了，讲维持现状就够了，这就已经退了一步了，现在已经在讲 什么叫做和平统一，已经开始讲这些问题了，所以就表示在台湾岛内的一些情况呢，是是有在是在变化，而且台湾也好，全世界的人都看得出美国人是靠不住的。特朗普这个总统大学，大学吧， 可以早上说一件一件事，完事，到下午就就推翻了，而且他要抢钱，抢的最猛的人像谁？他的蒙古。 所以作为美国的盟国，很多人都相信这句话，作为美国的敌人是很危险的，但是作为美国的盟友是致命的，所以我觉得如果台湾老百姓还看不到这一点，就真的是傻了。

告诉联合国秘书长，我根据联合国的条约规定，日本之外搞的话我可以出兵。嗯，就，就说我已经先尽到告知的责任。嗯，不要说我到时候动手的时候你说我不知道啊。这是第一件事情， 就是蛮严肃的了，从他的军事科技发展超超超过我们一般人的想象的进度啊， 练习的也很勤啊。这件事情就充分说明一件事，台，台湾是他的红线，因为你不是讲台湾有事，日本有事吗？现在中国大陆摆脱了自带我让你日本有事，我看你能不能有事。这这招是蛮狠的。

近日，有不少分析指出，在日本历任手相中，高氏扫描第一个明确表态，将台湾有事与存亡危机事态相挂钩。这意味着，一旦出现这种事态，日本即可行使所谓集体自卫权。日本武力介入台海成为可能，就触犯了中方的底线。请问发言人是否认同这种说法？ 联合国宪章规定的集体自卫权是为维护国际社会集体安全、防止法西斯势力复活而创设的权利。日本在二战后被限制行使这一权利。 波斯坦公告明确规定，日本禁止重新武装。日本在其宪法中承诺永远放弃发动战争、武力威胁或以武力作为解决国际争端的手段， 确立专守防卫原则。这些都是日本作为战败国义务的法律化。回顾历史不难发现， 以所谓存亡危机和自卫为名发动对外侵略，是日本军国主义的惯用伎俩。一九三一年能否得到满洲曾被视作威胁日本存亡，日本以此为借口发动九一八事变，侵占中国东北。 此后，日本宣称大东亚共荣圈是日本存亡之战，将侵略战火烧向整个亚洲，是否袭击珍珠港也曾被视为威胁日本存亡，由此点燃了太平洋战争的导火索。 警钟已经敲响，悲剧不能重演。在中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利八十周年之际，国际社会必须高度警惕，坚决阻击任何复活军国主义的图谋，共同维护战后国际秩序，守护世界和平。

我的感觉是特朗普是有一个比较特殊的一个态度啊，台湾是小事，台湾没什么，反正我不可，反正我特朗普不可能过去占据台湾，而且 台湾的那些高科技的厂，一飞机一飞机的人才拉到美国去，股权大部分是我们美国投资基金的，所以台湾其实不是对他来说不是一个重要的事。有一些美国的战略评论员就说，台湾让中国 往外势力的扩散能够受限制，就是第一导练，第二导练这些东西，那些战略性东西他觉得都是垃圾， 他是不相信的。他要关注的问题是钱，特别是现在政府还是没没发薪水呢，他就压力更大了。所以我觉得在这种情况之下，如果他谈问题态度是这样的话，就是很好的一个机会。 我为什么觉得他他不会对台湾有任何的动作呢？民主党还讲面子的，对蒙国绝对不能先开刀，特朗普在官身上先开刀的是蒙国，所以他不在乎别人怎么想他。

mark twins observation history doesn't repeat itself， but it often rhymes has never felt heavier today， the radway emanating from tokyo and a prime minister sanai takaichi carries a dangerous and a familiar alcohol of the darkest stances in the region's past earlier this month takaish declared during questioning in the japanese lower house budget committee that a contingency in taiwan could represent a survival threatening situation for japan directly implying armed intervention in the taiwan street， the last time， japan used the pretext offer survival crisis to justify preemptive military action it plunged east asia into the worst longest antifacious war in china's case is from 1931 to 1945， the human cost was staggering china alone suffered thirty five millimelitarian civilian casualties the depravity reached his peak in horrors like the nanjing massacre where over three hundred thousand chinese civilis and arm soldiers were slaughtered in just six weeks this all began with the same cynical argument before the 1931 september 18's incident architects of aggression a thirded that only the immediate arguation of chinese territory could secure japan's national survival years later before the attack on pearl harbor， the warmongers again insisted that a survival threatening situation forced them to strike first fast forward to the day takaichi has become the first sitting japanese leader to declare that a contingency in taiwan could constitute the same survival threatening situation she is doing this to complete a long term conservative project curing down the illegal fair walls of the post war order that order was built on the post and declaration and cemented by the article 9 of japan his pacifist constitution which explicitly forbids japan from maintaining a war potential， but decades of lego erosion have paved the way for takaichi's move the first bridge happened in 1954， which established the south defense forces and there's a loophole of inherent south defense the geographic bridge in 1999 defined that operational areas not geographically， but situationally allowing the sdf to roam the whole asia pacific the final bridge happened in 2014 to 2015 and able to change the constitution former prime minister chenzo， abe simply reinterpreted his cabinet resolution granted japan the right to collective self defense to fight alongside allies even with not being attacked this was a constitutional crew the hall of going to work for japan was now legal now takai， she is providing the wing and where by explicitly linking taiwan to a survival crisis she is taking a based legal weapon and aiming it at his first target she's moving japan from a legally war capable state to an openly combat ready one this is confirmed by japan's new security strategy which also rises massive offensive missiles and explicitly aims to resolve situations in a manner favorable to japan the mask of self defense is off this move provokes three devastating consequences for japan and the region first takaish's explicit strat of force values the un charter， which commands all states to refrain from the strat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity second it completely betrays the four sino japanese political documents including the 1972 john statement， where japan respected the stance that taiwan is an inalignable part of china third as worn by the chinese poe daily intervention risks turning the entire country into a battlefield by sacrificing is postwork commitment to peaceful development japan guarantees the deterioration of its its own security environment the critical question for the international community is this when a state uses sophisticated legal mechanisms not to uphold its constitution， but to systematically dismantle the poor international commitments that ended a world war what president that they said for global order history may rhyme， but the legal foundation of the post war order is immutable and the china takai intends to challenge today is not the china of yesteryear。